• 4K Blu-ray review: “Mortal Engines” (2018)

    “Mortal Engines” (2018) 

    Fantasy/Young Adult

    Running Time: 128 minutes

    Written by: Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens and Peter Jackson

    Directed by: Christian Rivers

    Featuring: Hugo Weaving, Hera Hilmar, Robert Sheehan, Jihae, Ronan Raftery, Leila George, Patrick Malahide and Stephen Lang

    Chudleigh Pomeroy:“Sixty minutes is all it took to bring humanity to the very brink of extinction. Mankind mobilized, a new age arose. The Age of the Great Predator Cities. Survival of the Fastest.”

    This month heralded the release of the latest young adult (YA) adaptation into cinemas, that being the box offie bomb “Mortal Engines” (2018). Unfortunately this movie was not a critical success either it was about as routine as they get as far as plot and narrative go, however this movie also had the audacity to not only riff on just about every other YA adaptation that has ever existed, but to also take a big leaf out of so many other genre films as to be embarrassing for anyone involved in this misguided adventure. It has become apparent lately, with so many terrible YA adaptions how limiting many of these adaptions can be as well as how much audiences have had enough, staying away in droves. There is no doubt that the nadir of YA adaptations is “The Hunger Games” (2011-2014) which was not only a behemoth at the box office but was also embraced (mostly) by critics and helped launch the career of Jennifer Lawrence as well as cementing a career for director Francis Lawrence, the low point although not definitively was the cheap imitation, the “Divergent” (2014-present) which devolved so quickly over its instalments that the studio all but gave up on the final one, with audiences being apathetic about its fate, there is no outcry for the final instalment from anyone. Where “Mortal Engines” fits is questionable, but it was an abject misfire, so it fits somewhere near the bottom of the heap, which considering its pedigree is not surprising at all. Not only was it uninspired but its plot and narrative were paint by numbers to such an extent that any possible originality was sucked out by the poor acting, formulaic screenplay as well as directing that was more B level than something that begged to be seen on the big screen. In fact this may have been better as a television adaption except that even now there are far too many similar themed shows on a variety of platforms with more engaging characters, better special effects and a plot that makes sense with fewer red herrings than it should have to keep audiences interested. Its never easy being at the end of anything so this movie comes at the end of a long movement of YA movies that have for the most part been failures, I am not sure what the production company was thinking as to why this would be any different, it may have been the modest budget, but this movie will definitely not make its money back. 

    This is an adaption from a series of novels by Philip Reeve, the first having been published in 2001, to be honest if this movie had been released then it may have fared better, as it would, at least, seemed to be more original, it being at the beginning of a cycle and not the end. It has been adapted by Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens and Peter Jackson of “The Lord of the Rings” and “Hobbit” (2001-2014) fame which looking back were overblown affairs themselves, but at least the source material was solid and once again when the first trilogy was released it seemed like something that was original and needed to be seen in cinemas, not on DVD. Unfortunately the three writers really only seem to be one trick ponies with everything else they have been involved in being mostly let downs, however with this new movie they have sunk to new lows. What is really surprising is that this movie is not directed by Peter Jackson, which looking back seems like a big mistake, but it is possible even he knew this was a reductive and unoriginal story so the reigns have been handed to first time director Christian Rivers, who has never been at the helm of anything like “Mortal Engines” before, judging from the results he will not be again. The direction is paint by numbers with little real originality making way for CGI spectacle instead of a real story with so many endless narrative coincidences as to be unbelievable and that’s in a fantasy genre, there are also so many characters that are not only formulaic tropes but are archetypes so familiar as to be ripped out of other stories wholesale. Basically if you have seen pretty much any “Star Wars” (1977-present) movie then you have seen this, except “Mortal Engines” has so much overblown game like CGI as to wonder what was the director thinking of when he made this? I am not a huge fan of giving an untested director hundreds of millions of dollars as the pressure rarely produces good results. If you look at a director like Christopher Nolan, not even he was put in charge of an equivalent movie until five movies into his career, it is hubris to think that Rivers is going to be better than Nolan.

    “Mortal Engines” follows a cataclysmic conflict known as the Sixty Minute War, the remnants of humanity regroup and form mobile “predator” cities. Under a philosophy known as “Municipal Darwinism”, larger cities hunt and absorb smaller settlements in the “Great Hunting Ground”, which includes Great Britain and Continental Europe. The city of London captures a small mining town called Salzhaken, absorbing its population and resources, under orders of Lord Mayor Magnus Crome. A masked woman among the Salzhakens is Hester Shaw, who seeks to assassinate Thaddeus Valentine, Head of the Guild of Historians. Tom Natsworthy, a teenage Apprentice Historian, is sent to London’s “Gut” to collect Old-Tech for London’s Museum, accompanied by Valentine’s good-natured daughter Katherine. Hester attempts to kill Valentine but Tom intervenes, pursuing Hester to a waste chute. Hester escapes, but not before telling him that Valentine murdered her mother and scarred her face. When Tom informs Valentine of this, he pushes Tom down the chute.

    Is it just me or whenever there is a post-apocalypse story especially a YA adaption almost all the good guys look not only perfect but seem to have a glow about them, so this cast is full of great looking people, dressing snappy and they all seem like they stepped out of a hair salon, maybe some of the writers and directors should watch a real post-apocalyptic movie like “Threads” (1984) to see how the world might really look. The movie has been cast with relative newcomer Hera Hilmar as the main character who does the job I assume she was told to do, so acquits herself in a truly broad role where she has all the answers, as well as the one who seems to be key to this plot, there is even an “Empire Strikes Back” (1980) moment involving her which seemed to be too funny to be true, but then this is that kind of movie. The rest of the movie is filled out with genre actors such as the lost looking and woefully miscast Robert Sheehan who still is unable to find a role that suits his talents, Hugo Weaving who cannot seem to break with Peter Jackson and Stephen Lang almost unrecognisable as a Terminator rip-off who only exists to pass a literal key to the hero to save the day. The rest of the cast are all cyphers and newcomers who will probably survive this as “Mortal Engines” has been such a dud that no one will remember they even appeared in this.

    “Mortal Engines” is such a reductive movie I wouldn’t even bother watching it on a streaming service, this is so unoriginal as well as an insult to not only its genre but to the people behind it that the writers and director really owe audiences who paid to see this an apology. It is the worst kind of movie that steals ideas, characters and themes from so many sources as to create a hodge podge of a movie that makes little sense. One of the bewildering parts of this and many other movies set in some fantasy laden post-apocalypse is that everything and everyone looks so good, with technology as well as living environments that look all sparkly, clean and completely disease free, there are no ugly people, no overweight people and no malnourished people either, in fact it looks more like an adventure park than anything else. Oh wait I get it this movie was a two-hour plus advert for a theme park, I get it now! The only saving grace is that nobodies Mothers name was Martha.

  • DVD/Blu-ray review: “Climax” (2018)

    “Climax” (2018) 

    Drama/Horror/Thriller

    Running Time: 96 minutes

    Written and Directed by: Gaspar Noé

    Featuring: Sofia Boutella, Kiddy Smile,Roman Guillermic, Souheila Yacoub, Claude Gajan Maull, Giselle Palmer, Taylor Kastle,Thea Carla Schøtt

    Title Card:“Death is an extraordinary experience.”

    The latest film from Argentinian (somewhat surrealist) director Gaspar Noé is released on DVD this month, that being the genre defying thriller “Climax” (2018) that for all its surreal storytelling style is actually Noé’s most ‘normal’ film to date, which is saying more about his previous efforts than this unique, mesmerizing and original piece of storytelling than anything else. There is no doubt at all that all of Noé’s work is in one way designed to push the boundaries of not only storytelling but cinema itself which he has done effectively throughout his career of narrative film, in fact I would go so far as to say that whilst I love his movies I would only view them once as many are visceral to such an extent that I would choose not to revisit them. To say that there are few people working today with such a unique voice would be an understatement, the only other person I can think of that matches his form is Lars von Trier (possibly Michael Winterbottom has some of his provocation as well) who also has made similarly themed films, like Noé has embraced more linear storytelling for what purpose remains a mystery. It could be that Noé would like to reach a larger audience as well as work with more mainstream talent or it could be the challenge for him to combine his unique way of working with more traditional narratives, whatever the reason it has to be said that his latest film, “Climax” is possibly his greatest achievement to date as it keeps one foot in his past while having a definite eye on the future, whatever that may hold for him.

    “Climax” is an audacious film that combines many elements on what is an obviously limited budget that walks a tightrope, as it needs to feel authentic which it does, but this authenticity means that there would have been a high degree of planning as well as failure before the end product ends up on the screen. Do not be fooled, it may look like much of this was made up on the spot but there is an element of detail that is breathtaking. The dance number that comes after the somewhat unique opening is fearless in its direction as well as its content, it is eye opening as it is filmed in one take with a myriad number of styles as well as twenty dancers all working together as well as being as unique as they can be. Shot in a single-take, the dance routine is more than just choreographed steps. The styles include voguing, an improvisational dance form that mixes exaggerated model poses with mime-like movement; waacking, characterized by rapid arm movements; and krumping, an aggressive and emotional dance born on the streets of South L.A.

    “Climax” has been written as well as directed by Gaspar Noé who also operates the camera that like his others films seemingly has a life of its own, moving, tilting as well as rotating at will following not only the loose plot, narrative but also the characters who all have their own stories before and after the drugs take effect. Noé has wisely made some important decisions that have had nothing but positive impacts on this new film, they are that he trusted dancers to be able to act, he has listened to his star performer, the fantastic Sofia Boutella and lastly he has employed a great choreographer, Nina McNeely. What is impressive is that the entire film was loosely plotted in a five-page outline that was then improvised into what is seen onscreen. There are many elements to the film, dance being one of them, the other is the feeling that there is no plot, which could be said to be true, however that is not the case at all. This is a film that attempts to capture what dance is, how it unfolds as well as the idea that dance, like life just moves forward with nobody really knowing what comes next or when it ends. It also speaks to what is important in life; also how we all as humans interact with each other and that ‘normality’ is just a word. One need only witness the complex relationships in the film before the drugs take over; while behaviours become extreme the dynamics remain the same. As with his previous work Noé balances shock with story to juxtapose images that create unease which is one of his primary tools in cinema, however it is much more moderated here than ever before, perhaps the sign of a maturing director, much like von Trier has become as he ages through life.

    “Climax” takes place in 1996, and focuses on the experiences of a dance troupe in a remote lodge surrounded by snowy emptiness, where late night dance battles take a dark turn after someone spikes the sangria with LSD. Noé takes his time establishing the vibrancy of the setting before tearing it apart: an ominous opening that finds one woman crawling through the snow, the ostensible final girl in the horror movie to come, followed by a prolonged introduction of the colorful ensemble in a series of audition tapes.

    This is a huge cast and its to Noé’s credit that he is able to not only give all of them their own moments but that he is able to accomplish this in such a short time frame. Not only that we as an audience are easily able to identify each character as well as their individual traits before they are exposed to the LSD. In fact even after the drugs are taken the audience is able to clearly see what is going with each one as well as the fate that awaits them in the final half of the film. What is impressive with the entire cast is that they are all primarily dancers so acting is not something that comes naturally in the first instance, which is impressive to say the least. 

    Gaspar Noé has a style as a director there is no doubt, he is not only a fan of the long take but (in fact extremely long take), but he also likes to move the camera in what must be called unconventional ways, mostly on a type of gimbal which can not only be unnerving but confusing as well. What Noé has done on past films is to use this style but he has been unable to marry it to a worthy script or idea to produce something not only original but also good enough that it sticks in the minds of audiences without a shock factor which he has relied on far too much, which to me is a great shame as he is obviously a unique filmmaker. What is fantastic about “Climax” is that Noé has seemingly been able to have his cake and eat it to, with a plot that complements the narrative with a central premise that he has been able to marry with his camera style, while being original, at times shocking which is a part of his DNA at this stage. 

    The other aspect of Noé’s filmmaking was that it always seemed to be his vision and no one else’s, however it is obvious that with “Climax” he has had to compromise with not only his actor/dancers but also with the employment of an experienced cinematographer which for me opens up the entire film in terms of performance and execution, it feels authentic to me even though I know little about dance. 

    If you are a fan of Noé’s I cannot believe that you would not like this film, if you have been turned off by his aggressive shocking style then this might turn you into an admirer of his, it is different from his previous work in that it shows a maturity that comes after working for so long much like his peers. The great element about Noé is that he seems to create work no one else even comes close to, he comments on life, love, sex, politics and other aspects of life that others do not come close to, that is why admire him, he has no fear. I recommend this movie and it is easy to rewatch so it should be added to any collection, it is released on DVD in New Zealand but if you can grab it on Blu-ray, it will not disappoint.

    Climax Soundtrack:

    01 Cerrone: “Supernature (Instrumental Climax Edit)”
    02 Patrick Hernandez: “Born to Be Alive (Instrumental New Version)”
    03 M/A/R/R/S: “Pump up the Volume (USA Radio Edit)”
    04 Dopplereffekt: “Superior Race”
    05 Chris Carter: “Solidit (Climax Edit)”
    06 Dopplereffekt: “Technic 1200”
    07 Kiddy Smile: “Dickmatized”
    08 Thomas Bangalter: “What to Do?”
    09 Thomas Bangalter: “Sangria”
    10 Neon: “Voices”
    11 Suburban Knights: “The World’s”
    12 Aphex Twin: “Windowlicker”
    13 Wild Planet: “Electron”
    14 Soft Cell: “Tainted Love/Where Did Our Love Go (Extended)”
    15 Giorgio Moroder: “Utopia – Me Giorgio”
    16 Thibaut Barbillon: “Angie (Instrumental Cover)”
    17 CoH Plays Cosey: “Mad”
    18 Gary Numan: “Trois Gymnopedies (First Movement)”

  • Television/Streaming review: “Project Blue Book – Episode Ten – The Washington Merry-Go Round” (2019)

    “Project Blue Book – Episode Ten – The Washington Merry-Go Round”

    Sci-Fi

    Ten Episodes

    Created by: David O’Leary

    Featuring: Aidan Gillen, Laura Mennell, Michael Harney, Ksenia Solo, Michael Malarkey

    Alien Abduction: “The alleged abduction of a person by an extraterrestrial being.”

    This new series revolves around secret U.S. Air Force investigations into supposed UFO encounters and unexplained phenomenon, undertaken by astrophysicist, and eventual ufologist, Josef Allen Hynek in the 1950s and 1960s.

    This week’s finale, is both a direct continuation of last weeks episode as well as a cliffhanger of sorts that sets the series up nicely for a second season that is definitely on its way. It does take a real case from the files but it does exaggerate the event itself which is not unlike previous weeks installments. The episode, as with the previous, seems to be realistic in how it portrays all the happenings, however it takes a sharp turn when dealing with what happened as well as the possible importance to UFOlogy that this case would ultimately have.

    “The Washington Merry-Go Round” is based on an event when UFOs swarm the National Mall in Washington, DC. According to records, in July 1952, a DC air traffic controller improbably named Edward Nugent was the first to notice something truly unique as well as completely unprecedented. He would be far from the only one to send in a report, and in fact, the sightings would continue the next weekend.

    After the UFO Washington, D.C. incident of July 19, 1952, the headlines from The Washington Post’s Mdeclared, “’Saucer Outruns Jet, Pilot Reveals.” The article stated that the Air Defense Command sent a jet pilot up “to investigate the objects,” but was unable to overtake the moving glowing lights.

    According to The Washington Post, the UFOs hovered only 1,700 feet above the White House lawn. An Air Force spokesperson said that their organization took steps to properly investigate the event, but the newspaper found the investigation veiled in secrecy. An unidentified traffic controller said the radar signals ruled out the possibility that the objects were due to weather conditions. He noted that they looked like an “aircraft in flight” on the radar screen.

    As luck would have it, Air Force Captain, Edward J. Ruppelt, supervisor of the Air Force’s Project Blue Book, was in Washington, D.C. He learned of the UFO incident from reading the newspaper and discussed the situation with Captain Roy James, a radar specialist. James thought unusual weather conditions could have been responsible for objects appearing to show on radar.

    On July 29, 1952, Air Force Major Generals John Samford, Director of Intelligence, and Roger Ramsey, Director of Operations held the largest press conference of any since the end of World War II. The official explanation of the July UFO sightings was that:

    • The objects were “misidentified aerial phenomena,” which could mean they were stars or meteors
    • The blips on the radar were due to temperature inversions Samford also said that the since the radar blips were not caused by any solid material, there was no threat to national security. He explained that when a weather inversion occurs, lights that are really on the ground may look like they are in the air and this caused the radar to misreport ground objects being in the sky.

    The explanation was not well-received. Ruppelt, from Project Blue Book, noted that during the months of June, July and August in Washington D.C. “hardly a night passed” where there wasn’t a temperature inversion and there were not routine UFO sightings on the radar. All air traffic controller involved stated that even if the weather could cause a blip on the radar, it would be as a straight line and would not appear as lights.

    As we move further through this first season (now renewed for a second) it is starting to become apparent what kind of show this is turning into, that is a Cold War version of the “X-Files” (1993-present) which as I have stated in the past is not a completely bad or negative thing to be, especially in this day and age of ‘fake news’. What I mean by that is that “Project Blue Book” (2019) is taking real events, or at least real reports of reported events that really have not been substantiated, then making narrative leaps in terms of showing them onscreen as well as creating new stories about how they fit into a wider narrative, albeit something of a conspiracy revolving around new technology as well as Cold War paranoia. For some people who have watched the “X-Files” some of the stories as well as the narrative flourishes may seem all to familiar but I am actually enjoying it as it is similar to viewing something I enjoyed from a new angle, but I can understood others who may think this is a little bit of a ripoff.

    This episodes actual events fall in line nicely with the ongoing Cold War motif that has permeated the series so far. The extremely high numbers of UFO reports in 1952 disturbed both the Air Force and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Both groups felt that an enemy nation could deliberately flood the U.S. with false UFO reports, causing mass panic and allowing them to launch a sneak attack. On September 24, 1952, the CIA’s Office of Scientific Intelligence (OSI) sent a memorandum to Walter B. Smith, the CIA’s Director. The memo stated that “the flying saucer situation . . . [has] national security implications . . . [in] the public concern with the phenomena . . . lies the potential for the touching-off of mass hysteria and panic.” The result of this memorandum was the creation in January 1953 of the Robertson Panel. Dr. Howard P. Robertson, a physicist, chaired the panel, which consisted of prominent scientists and which spent four days examining the “best” UFO cases collected by Project Blue Book. The panel dismissed nearly all of the UFO cases it examined as not representing anything unusual or threatening to national security. In the panel’s controversial estimate, the Air Force and Project Blue Book needed to spend less time analyzing and studying UFO reports and more time publicly debunking them. The panel recommended that the Air Force and Project Blue Book should take steps to “strip the Unidentified Flying Objects of the special status they have been given and the aura of mystery they have unfortunately acquired.

    As far as last episodes of first seasons go, especially in regard to genre television this one is actually fairly standard, it is nothing less than one would expect taking into account the early news that this series was guaranteed a second season. This means that not only does there have to be any meaningful resolution to any of the plot threads that have been started, but it is possible to introduce entirely new strands to keep audiences guessing as well as enticing them back for future seasons.

    In fact this final episode is eerily similar to the aforementioned “X-Files” first season cliffhanger in that it points to a future that has a solid point of view, like that “Project Blue Book” is definitely embracing conspiracy as its prime mover with hints at aliens as well as other things that that mean the future is heading into the extreme fictional universe of UFOs and all that entails. The final scene is a sign that any tip of the hat to reality is going to be left in the rear view mirror.

    Episode Ten – The Washington Merry-Go Round

    Directed by: Alex Graves

    Written by: David O’Leary

    Washington D.C. is invaded by UFOs, and Hynek and Quinn must uncover the true nature of the threat before it’s too late.

  • Trailer: “Dora and the Lost City of Gold” (2019)

    Trailer: “Dora and the Lost City of Gold” (2019)

    Having spent most of her life exploring the jungle with her parents nothing could prepare Dora (Isabela Moner) for the most dangerous adventure ever – High School. 

    Always the explorer, Dora quickly finds herself leading her monkey friend Boots (voiced by Danny Trejo), Diego (Jeffrey Wahlberg), and a ragtag group of teens on a live-action adventure to save her parents and solve the impossible mystery behind a lost Inca civilization.

    dora_and_the_lost_city_of_gold_official_trailer_2019_dora_the_explorer_live_action_movie_hd_Iglz3SrmZZI_1080p

    Eva Longoria, Michael Pena, Benicio del Toro, Eugenio Derbez, Nicholas Coombe, Madeleine Madden, and Adriana Barraza co-star. The film opens in cinemas on August 2nd.

  • International Trailer: “Ma” (2019)

    International Trailer: “Ma” (2019)

    “Ma” (2019) is an upcoming American psychological horror-thriller film directed by Tate Taylor and written by Scotty Landes and Taylor, from a story by Landes. It stars Octavia Spencer, Juliette Lewis, Diana Silvers, Luke Evans, McKaley Miller, Missi Pyle, Corey Fogelmanis, Gianni Paolo and Dante Brown. The film is being produced by Jason Blum through Blumhouse Productions and John Norris.

    Ma – Official Trailer (Universal Pictures) HD

    The story follows Sue Ann (Octavia Spencer), a loner who keeps to herself in her quiet Ohio town. One day, she is asked by Maggie (Diana Silvers), a new teenager in town, to buy some booze for her and her friends, and Sue Ann sees the chance to make some unsuspecting, if younger, friends of her own. She offers the kids the chance to avoid drinking and driving by hanging out in the basement of her own. But there are some house rules: One of the kids has to stay sober. Don’t curse. Never go upstairs. And call her “Ma.” But as Ma’s hospitality starts to curdle into obsession, what began as a teenage dream turns into a terrorizing nightmare, and Ma’s place goes from the best place in town to the worst place on earth.

  • Trailer: “John Wick: Chapter 3 – Parabellum”

    Trailer: “John Wick: Chapter 3 – Parabellum”

    “John Wick: Chapter 3 – Parabellum” features Keanu Reeves as the titular character in the third installment in the John Wick film series, following John Wick (2014) and John Wick: Chapter 2 (2017). The film is directed by Chad Stahelski and with a screenplay written by Derek Kolstad, Shay Hatten, Chris Collins and Marc Abrams, based on a story by Kolstad. It also stars Halle Berry, Laurence Fishburne, Mark Dacascos, Asia Kate Dillon, Lance Reddick, Saïd Taghmaoui, Jerome Flynn, Tobias Segal, Boban Marjanović, Anjelica Huston and Ian McShane.

    JOHN WICK 3 Official Trailer 2 (2019) Keanu Reeves Movie HD

    Still on the run following his assassination of Santino D’Antonio in The Continental, and with a $14 million global contract on him, John Wick (Keanu Reeves) is banned from every Continental service, which forces him to fight his way out of New York City with the help of a hitwoman (Halle Berry) who still trusts him.

  • Trailer: “Once Upon A Time in Hollywood” (2019)

    Trailer: “Once Upon A Time in Hollywood” (2019)

    In 1969 Los Angeles, a television actor and his stunt double embark on an odyssey to make a name for themselves in the film industry.

    once_upon_a_time_in_hollywood_official_teaser_trailer_hd_Scf8nIJCvs4_1080p

    Once Upon a Time in Hollywood is a black comedy, crime film written and directed by Quentin Tarantino and starring Leonardo DiCaprio, Brad Pitt and Margot Robbie. Set in Los Angeles, the film tells the story of television actor Rick Dalton and his stunt double Cliff Booth as they try to get involved in the film industry.

  • Television/Streaming review: “Project Blue Book – Episode Nine – Abduction” (2019)

    “Project Blue Book – Episode Nine – Abduction”

    Sci-Fi

    Ten Episodes

    Created by: David O’Leary

    Featuring: Aidan Gillen, Laura Mennell, Michael Harney, Ksenia Solo, Michael Malarkey

    Alien Abduction: “The alleged abduction of a person by an extraterrestrial being.”

    This new series revolves around secret U.S. Air Force investigations into supposed UFO encounters and unexplained phenomenon, undertaken by astrophysicist, and eventual ufologist, Josef Allen Hynek in the 1950s and 1960s.

    This week’s episode, the ninth, breaks the pattern of the previous installments, which is a nice change, in fact this feels like a bottle episode. It does take a real case from the files but it does exaggerate, like many of the previous cases how the two investigators approach the ‘victims’, as well as the event itself which is almost entirely fictional in its setting as well as its outcome . The episode, as with the previous, seems to be realistic in how it portrays all the happenings, however it takes a sharp turn when dealing with what happened as well as the possible importance to UFOlogy that this case would ultimately have.

    “Abduction” has been inspired by the renowned Barney and Betty Hill abduction case which had captivated the public as the couple opened up about their encounter. Although Betty and Barney’s story isn’t the first reported case about alien abduction, their story was certainly publicized to such an extent that it began to shape how discussions about alien encounters and abductions are done, to this day.

    As we move further through this first season (now renewed for a second) it is starting to become apparent what kind of show this is turning into, that is a Cold War version of the “X-Files” (1993-present) which as I have stated in the past is not a completely bad or negative thing to be, especially in this day and age of ‘fake news’. What I mean by that is that “Project Blue Book” (2019) is taking real events, or at least real reports of reported events that really have not been substantiated, then making narrative leaps in terms of showing them onscreen as well as creating new stories about how they fit into a wider narrative, albeit something of a conspiracy revolving around new technology as well as Cold War paranoia. For some people who have watched the “X-Files” some of the stories as well as the narrative flourishes may seem all to familiar but I am actually enjoying it as it is similar to viewing something I enjoyed from a new angle, but I can understood others who may think this is a little bit of a ripoff.

    This particular case, based on the Hills’ story play’s a large part in the overall narrative as well as the future of “Project Blue Book”. This story comes at a very interesting point on the show, when Hynek and Quinn are almost at odds with each other ever since Quinn discovered the strange object Hynek had been hiding from him for so long. This case might be crucial for their partnership, as Quinn is on the verge of losing his head over the Air Force’s incapability to rely on the truth and mask facts with fiction.

    Of course we still have the dual narrative of the possible Russian spy befriending Hynek’s wife which has now been folded into an alien conspiracy plot that links back to episode one, whether or not this ever happened is unknown to me, but I would say not as it adds too much color to the series. That is not a bad thing but it does nicely tie in the entire family to a possible over arching alien conspiracy which is right out of Chris Carters playbook. The other idea that we are seeing even more of is the Cold War plot linking to the ‘Red Under the Bed’ as well as the nuclear war tensions that existed, we even see a Saturday alarm test where people are told to seek shelter.

    An aspect of this episode as well as something it had in common with earlier episodes is the relationship between Susie and Mimi, we still are unaware of the actual objective of Susie as this week she takes action that throws her entire purpose into doubt. It is a surprising twist in a plot that is definitely subordinate to the main Blue Book plot but does peak to power in relationships that existed then especially between men, women and the countries they originate from.

    As this is the penultimate episode there are certain points that need to be hit, so of course the man in black turns up to light the way for Hynek to take him on a trip that will be continued in the final episode of the season.

    Episode Nine – Abduction

    Directed by: Alex Graves

    Written by: Sean Jablonski

    A man, who claims he was abducted by aliens, and his wife arrive at the headquarters and hold Hynek and Quinn hostage until they learn the truth.


  • Television/Streaming review: “Project Blue Book – Episode Eight – War Games” (2019)

    “Project Blue Book – Episode Eight – War Games”

    Sci-Fi

    Ten Episodes

    Created by: David O’Leary

    Featuring: Aidan Gillen, Laura Mennell, Michael Harney, Ksenia Solo, Michael Malarkey

    Remote Viewing: “The practice of seeking impressions about a distant or unseen target, purportedly using extrasensory perception (ESP) or “sensing” with the mind.”

    This new series revolves around secret U.S. Air Force investigations into supposed UFO encounters and unexplained phenomenon, undertaken by astrophysicist, and eventual ufologist, Josef Allen Hynek in the 1950s and 1960s.

    This week’s episode, the eighth, follows the pattern of the previous installments, which is rather enjoyable, it follows yet another event but it does exaggerate even more than the others how the two investigators approach the ‘victims’, as well as the event itself which is almost entirely fictional in its setting as well as the outcome . The episode, as with the previous, seems to be realistic as that is how it portrays all the happenings, however it takes a sharp turn when dealing with the minutiae as well as the macro events instead this episode to create an entirely fictional investigation, the first time this has occurred.

    In this episode, “War Games” orbs of lights seemingly attack a group of Army Rangers, this story is completely fictional, not based on any entry in the ‘Project Blue Book’ files at all, this is the first time this has happened in the series, so we are witnessing the largest divergence yet from any kind of factual narrative. However, several of the situations referenced, although very “X-Files”like as well as conspiratorial do have their roots in reality. The parts that are based in reality are that the military carry out tests using their own personnel. In 2015, several veterans sued because of lasting effects due to experiments they had been a part of. One Army scientists explained that at least one of these tests was related to learning how to induce “fear, panic, hysteria, and hallucinations.” One veteran explained how he hallucinated for 40 hours. During that time he had thought there were bugs under his skin he wanted to cut out with a razor, and he says he saw “animals coming out of the walls,” including “a huge rabbit” with red eyes. What this means and what the episode alludes to is that no matter what you may think about aliens the most terrifying stuff happening to people is a result of other humans.

    As we move further through this first season (now renewed for a second) it is starting to become apparent what kind of show this is turning into, that is a Cold War version of the “X-Files” (1993-present) which as I have stated in the past is not a completely bad or negative thing to be, especially in this day and age of ‘fake news’. What I mean by that is that “Project Blue Book” (2019) is taking real events, or at least real reports of reported events that really have not been substantiated, then making narrative leaps in terms of showing them onscreen as well as creating new stories about how they fit into a wider narrative, albeit something of a conspiracy revolving around new technology as well as Cold War paranoia. For some people who have watched the “X-Files” some of the stories as well as the narrative flourishes may seem all to familiar but I am actually enjoying it as it is similar to viewing something I enjoyed from a new angle, but I can understood others who may think this is a little bit of a ripoff.

    One of the major aspects of “Project Blue Book” is its visual style, the cinematography as well as the overall production design is excellent, even for a series that is on the History Channel. There has been some serious investment so that in the surface at least it looks as good as it can as well as feeling authentic. The special effects have been excellent throughout the season, this episode is no different with some great use of CGI.

    Of course we still have the dual narrative of the possible Russian spy befriending Hynek’s wife which has now been folded into an alien conspiracy plot that links back to episode one, whether or not this ever happened is unknown to me, but I would say not as it adds too much color to the series. That is not a bad thing but it does nicely tie in the entire family to a possible over arching alien conspiracy which is right out of Chris Carters playbook. The other idea that we are seeing even more of is the Cold War plot linking to the ‘Red Under the Bed’ as well as the nuclear war tensions that existed, we even see a Saturday alarm test where people are told to seek shelter.

    An aspect of this episode as well as something it had in common with earlier episodes is the expiration od the relationship between Susie and Mimi which indicates a possible sexual on in nature, something that would have been considered unusual for the 1950s. In this episode, yet again there is a scene in which it seems like Susie is going to attempt to kiss Mimi. In this case, Mimi is feeling vulnerable, so she asks Susie to help her learn how to shoot a gun. During the training, Susie touches Mimi lightly like a gentle caress and stares into her face longingly. It seemed as though an attempt at a kiss was imminent, but it didn’t happen. I still wonder, is this going somewhere.

    Episode Eight – War Games

    Directed by: Norma Bailey

    Written by: Thania St. John

    Hynek and Quinn investigate a film documenting an Army platoon under UFO attack, and find the soldiers not only suffer from the physical effects of war, but psychological ones as well.


  • Trailer: “Toy Story 4” (2019)

    “Toy Story 4” (2019)

    The film continues from Toy Story 3, where Sheriff Woody (Tom Hanks) and Buzz Lightyear (Tim Allen), among their other toy friends, have found new appreciation after being given by Andy Davis to Bonnie Anderson. They are introduced to Forky (Tony Hale), a spork that has been made into a toy, and they soon embark on a road trip adventure alongside old and new friends. In addition to Hanks and Allen, the film will feature returning cast members, including Annie Potts reprising her role as Bo Peep. New additions include Tony Hale, Keegan-Michael Key, Jordan Peele, and Keanu Reeves.

    toy_story_4_official_trailer_2019_disney_movie_hd_TxtZhhCJkIY_1080p

    Woody (Tom Hanks) has always been confident about his place in the world, and that his priority is taking care of his owner, whether that is Andy or Bonnie. So when Bonnie’s beloved new craft-project-turned-toy, Forky (Tony Hale), declares himself as “trash” and not a toy, Woody takes it upon himself to show Forky why he should embrace being a toy. But when Bonnie takes the whole gang on her family’s road trip excursion, Woody ends up on an unexpected detour that includes a reunion with his long-lost girlfriend Bo Peep (Annie Potts). After years of being on her own, Bo’s adventurous spirit and life on the road belie her delicate porcelain exterior. As Woody and Bo realize they are worlds apart when it comes to life as a toy, they soon come to find that it is the least of their worries.

  • DVD review: “Destination Wedding” (2018) 

    “Destination Wedding” (2018) 

    Comedy

    Running Time: 85 minutes

    Written and Directed by: Victor Levin

    Featuring: Winona Ryder and Keanu Reeves

    Lindsay:“Why didn’t we meet seven years ago?”

    Frank:“Just lucky I guess.”

    “Destination Wedding” (2018) released this month on DVD is an unusual movie, a romantic comedy featuring two stars of the past reunited onscreen after twenty years, last appearing together in “The Private Lives of Pippa Lee” (2009), in Winona Ryder and Keanu Reeves who both give very good performances in a movie that while not perfect I found to be a fun watch as well as having just enough originality for me to recommend to others. For anyone that has ever seen a rom-com there will be little surprise in the actual narrative as well as plot, if there is one thing that is apparent this is not going to be an original movie. The fact that it isn’t original is not a negative at all as this movie has been written expressly for the dialogue, the two lead characters as well as a chance to spend almost ninety minutes with the same characters experiencing what they do through conversation, sometimes jammed together but if you are on-board from the beginning of the movie this should not bother you in the slightest.

    Any prospective viewer should make no mistake this is a micro budget feature that actually has only two actors making up the entire cast with no other speaking parts for anyone else, in fact there are few other actors even featured in the same frame as the two principles, which not reflects the budget but the aesthetic the writer/director was going for in the first place. It is not completely unusual for movies to have a small cast, a movie that sprung to mind immediately was the under rated Gus Van Sant two hander “Gerry” (2002). However here the difference is that this is a (somewhat) comedy, which means it does not attempt to keep the audience engaged through genre plot devices, it needs to stand on the two elements, the performances of the leads as well as the quality of the dialogue. Over the decades Keanu Reeves has taken chances with his career appearing in a wide variety of movies that audiences might be surprised to see him in, this one is no surprise and he embraces the role of someone who on the surface is abrasive and unlikeable. However what is a surprise is to see Winona Ryder playing a character that on the surface is unlikable as well but has something deeper going on as well. It is also a welcome sight to actually see Ryder onscreen as she has made sporadic appearances in movies as a support role not a lead, here she is most definitely a co-lead and plays the part very well. 

    “Destination Wedding” has been written and directed by Victor Levin who it should be said has much more experience in writing than directing which shows in this new movie, as it is all conversation and little else, in fact the movie is so well set out with its mise en scène, narrative and plot that the direction takes care of itself which is a negative as well as a positive. This movie is so slight and intimate that if an audience has issues with appending time with two characters for almost an hour and half then this is not for them. However if you want to see two very good actors sparring for almost the entirety of a narrative then they will be richly rewarded as both Ryder and Reeves have some serious chemistry that pops onscreen elevating the material so that it does become fascinating for those interested.

    “Destination Wedding” is based around Lindsay and Frank who are two strangers invited to Frank’s brother’s wedding in Paso Robles, California. While there, they get to know that they are more than strangers and share an equal level of irritableness and grief towards the world. However, under the thick cloud of exasperation the hopeless romantics slowly fall for each other.

    I enjoyed this movie a lot it is the perfect watch for an afternoon where you want to spend some time with two quite unlikeable people who seem to be perfect for each other, the payoff comes when you realise that as soon as they meet they seem like an old married couple completely comfortable with each others foibles and eccentricities. Once you realise this you will be on-board or will hate it but it is rewarding to those that can see through its shortcomings.

  • DVD review: “Born Racer” (2018)

    “Born Racer” (2018) 

    Documentary

    Running Time: 88 minutes

    Directed by: Bryn Evans

    Featuring: Scott Dixon, Emma Davies-Dixon and Kenny Szymanski

    Emma Davies-Dixon:“…unless he’s going really fast, he doesn’t feel alive.”

    Released this month on DVD is the documentary “Born Racer” (2018) based mostly around New Zealand born car racer Scott Dixon who now makes his living in the US. For me this movie is less a must see movie, rather it is for those that enjoy motor sports or have an affinity to see a small town person making good on his early promise as well as having been backed by people that believed and still believe in him. 

    Many documentary filmmakers attempt to change or improve society in some way with their documentaries. Their goal is to bring to light a certain cause or injustice with the hope that their film will help galvanize the masses to demand change. An example might be a documentary on a humanitarian crisis in Sudan. For other documentaries, the goal is simply to entertain or delight the audience in some way. These are called human-interest stories. At its core “Born Racer” really is nothing more than a diversion, no real substance but an mostly enjoyable narrative for the entire family.

    The past two years or so has been an excellent year for documentaries not only on streaming or DVD but in cinemas which is a trend that goes against what many people may have expected. However I find this to be exactly what should be expected especially with the concentration of so-called ‘fake news’ that now exists on the internet, coupled with what has been coming from the White House under the Trump Presidency. In fact there was a thought that cinematic documentaries might be a thing of the past especially with the success as well as saturation of Disney-fied blockbusters invading multiplexes, in fact audiences have been flocking to cinemas to seek out stories about real people making real differences in times and places where many others have been marginalised and made powerless by the people in charge in their respective times. Some of the great, as well as critically received, not forgetting making money documentaires at the box office are: “Wont you be my neighbour?” (2018), “Three Identical Strangers” (2018), “Jane” (2018),  “RBG” (2018), and my personal favourite “Bombshell: The Hedy Lamarr Story” (2017) with so many more. What this says about audiences is that they will seek out true stories told in the relative first person that are not only inspiring but are direct counter programming to the politics of the day as well as the lies that are being produced by a President who is not only artificial but hate fuelled. My belief as a fan of documentaries is that this genre will only gain in popularity, with the coming years being a boon as well as revealing the importance of truth in the media as well as the importance of researching decisions made by the electorate. It is no surprise that the rise in fake news, Donald Trump, racism and may other hate fuelled elements has been answered by artists creating documentaries that prove there can be positive outcomes when people choose to buck the system as well as believing in others, differences, freedom and most of all, discussion. 

    This is for the most part an inspirational story of dedication, danger and fear. It’s about desire for success and accomplishment and the search for ultimate meaning, purpose in life; a narrative on the unforgiving world of professional racing and the unique individuals who inhabit it. This action-packed, yet highly intimate and intense blend of close-up observational filming and never-seen-before spectacular, cutting-edge racing footage explores exactly what it takes to compete in the world’s fastest and most diverse racing series.

    There is no doubt that Scott Dixon is one of New Zealand’s most successful sporting exports and yet many Kiwis know little about his personal and professional life. The 38-year-old has dominated America’s premiere motorsport competition – the IndyCar series – during the past decade, winning four of the past 11 championships. Directed by Bryn Evans “Born Racer” attempts to lift the lid on the Brisbane-born Dixon and expose local audiences to the rigours of one of the USA’s most-beloved sporting obsessions.

    “Born Racer” is an absolutely fine piece of film making, it checks off all the parts you would expect in a documentary like this, it is a profile movie of the most vanilla kind it will not offend anyone but on the other hand it will not be of any surprise to an audience who may have liked a deeper dive into this car racing hero.

  • Trailer: “Us” (2019)

    “Us” (2019)

    Husband and wife Gabe (Winston Duke) and Adelaide Wilson (Lupita Nyong’o) take their children (Evan Alex and Shahadi Wright Joseph) to their beach house, hoping to spend time with friends. Their serenity soon turns to tension and chaos when a group of evil strangers (referred to as ‘The Tethered’), who look exactly like them, arrive.

    us_official_trailer_hd_hNCmb-4oXJA_1080p

    Us is a 2019 American psychological horror-thriller film written and directed by Jordan Peele. The film stars Lupita Nyong’o, Winston Duke, Elisabeth Moss, and Tim Heidecker, and follows a family who are confronted by a group of doppelgängers.


  • DVD review: “Unbroken: Path to Redemption” (2018)

    “Unbroken: Path to Redemption” (2018)

    Drama

    Running Time: 98 minutes

    Written by: Richard Friedenberg and Ken Hixon

    Directed by: Harold Cronk

    Featuring: Samuel Hunt, Merritt Patterson, Vincenzo Amato, Vanessa Bell Calloway, Bobby Campo, Bob Gunton, Maddalena Ischiale, David Sakurai and Gary Cole

    Released this month on DVD is a movie, “Unbroken: Path to Redemption” (2018) that is, at first glance an oddity as it is a sequel of sorts to a film from 2014 that being “Unbroken” (2014) a true story based around Louis “Louie” Zamperini who qualifies for the 1936 Olympics. When World War II breaks out, Louie enlists in the military. After his plane crashes in the Pacific, he survives an incredible 47 days adrift in a raft, until his capture by the Japanese navy. Sent to a POW camp, Louie becomes the favorite target of a particularly cruel prison commander. It was a high profile film as it was directed by Angelina Jolie as well as featuring in starring roles many young and upcoming actors, it was also seen in the early days of its release as an Academy Awards contender. However the awards never really appeared and the movie faded early from the box office as well as awards contention. 

    Now comes a sequel nobody was really asking for, so the question is why, what is the motivation? Well its simple really someone has seen the potential in pivoting this movie towards the faith based genre which over the past ten years has been profitable, of course it does mean that it is good. 

    “Unbroken: Path to Redemption” is based on Laura Hillenbrand’s bestselling book, the film begins where the movie “Unbroken” concludes, sharing the next chapter of the true story of Olympian and World War II veteran Louis Zamperini. Haunted by nightmares of his torment, Louie sees himself as anything but a hero. Then, he meets Cynthia, a young woman who captures his eye—and his heart. Louie’s quest for revenge drives him deeper into despair, putting the couple on the brink of divorce until Cynthia experiences Billy Graham’s 1949 Los Angeles Crusade, where both find faith in Jesus Christ, a renewed commitment to their marriage; and, Louie finds forgiveness for his wartime captors.

    There is nothing wrong with this movie on the surface it is perfectly well carried out with some very talented people in front of as well as behind the camera, the issue is that “Unbroken: Path to Redemption” is extremely dull, bordering on boring with a narrative that is over the top preachy that you can feel want to lecture an audience on the sins of amorality. To be honest the original was not the most amazing film but it looks like a masterpiece compared to this, it is no wonder it has gone straight to DVD in New Zealand.

  • Trailer: “Avengers: Endgame” (2019)

    Trailer: “Avengers: Endgame” (2019)

    Following the events of Avengers: Infinity War, with half of the universe killed in an event dubbed “The Decimation”, the universe lies in shambles and the remaining Avengers and their allies must reassemble to repair the damage caused by Thanos and bring harmony back to the universe.

    The film is directed by Anthony and Joe Russo with a screenplay by Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely and features an ensemble cast including Robert Downey Jr., Chris Evans, Mark Ruffalo, Chris Hemsworth, Scarlett Johansson, Jeremy Renner, Don Cheadle, Paul Rudd, Brie Larson, Karen Gillan, Danai Gurira, Benedict Wong, Jon Favreau, Bradley Cooper, Gwyneth Paltrow, and Josh Brolin.

    “Avengers: Endgame” opens 26th April 2019.

  • 4K Blu-ray review: “Bad Times at the El Royale” (2018)

    “Bad Times at the El Royale” (2018) 

    Thriller/Action

    Running Time: 141 minutes

    Written & directed by: Drew Goddard

    Featuring:  Jeff Bridges, Cynthia Erivo, Dakota Johnson, Jon Hamm, Cailee Spaeny, Lewis Pullman, Nick Offerman and Chris Hemsworth

    Miles Miller:[to Father Flynn] “This is not a place for a priest, Father. You shouldn’t be here.”

    Laramie Seymour Sullivan:“We might need to work on your sales pitch, son. “The El Royale: no place for a priest.”

    Critical Commentary:

    Released this week on DVD, Blu-ray and 4K is the thriller “Bad Times at the El Royale” (2018) a period piece that has trouble knowing exactly what kind of movie it wants to be so ends up being a hybrid of many movies that does not have a strong enough centre for it to hold together as strong as it should. It ultimately ends up being enjoyable but about very little which is a hugely missed opportunity for all involved as there are some truly great performances that light up the screen and deserve much better than they ultimately are left with. The other element of the movie that is (unfortunately) noticeable is the running time, “Bad Times at the El Royale” clocks in at almost two and a half hours, which in a movie like this indicates that the narrative is not only sprawling but that it takes a long time to get anywhere meaningful, which it does, costing it much in its plot as well as keeping an audience engaged with the story, at times you might be forgiven for asking yourself, what is this movie actually about? When writing and directing a movie there must be a point to it first, what reason does it have to exist, there are lofty ambitions at play here but I think the skill to execute them may be lacking, for now anyway.

    There are a number of seemingly unique aspects to “Bad Times at the El Royale” including but not limited to multiple narratives that are being told in the present as well as the past, not only that sometimes there is overlapping narratives so as to have them told from different points of view which can look smart, but here is made an afterthought as the actual plot is so dense but at the same time adds up to not a lot. There have been times when this technique adds to a film, none more so than the great “Pulp Fiction” (1994) which used something similar but to a greater effect as it was not covering up shortcomings in the movie itself. Another aspect of this movie is that it is a period piece being set in 1969 which means the writer/director is able to remove modern elements that would mean many of the story elements just wouldn’t work. Not only that but there would be a tendency to make direct comparisons to the world we live in today instead of just hinting at them. It also introduces a large number of characters that vary greatly in quality as well as believability, then proceeds to slowly give backstories as well as sometimes either kill them off or link them to other threads that don’t really go anywhere. There have been many films that take sprawling stories attempting to interweave them to create something that is more than the sum of its parts, such as the aforementioned “Pulp Fiction” as well as the timeless classic “Short Cuts” (1993), however what both of these had in common were great source material as well as great directors. These are two elements that are sadly lacking in “Bad Times at the El Royale” which is a real shame as there is something at work here that could have been fleshed out to produce a very special movie, as within the production there are at least three very good performances, which ultimately end up being wasted. That is not to say that this genre of movie with all its devices should not be attempted but it should not be a directors second feature behind the camera, it takes experience to balance all the elements that are at play in this movie.

    Written, directed and produced by Drew Goddard who is more famous for being discovered by Joss Whedon and who has mainly contributed to Whedons’ projects mostly in “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” (1996-2003), “Angel” (1999-2004) as well as the genre movies “Cloverfield” (2008), “World War Z” (2013) and “The Martian” (2015). Here he is flying solo, the results being somewhat mixed. The difference between all of Goddard’s earlier work and “Bad Times at the El Royale” is one of collaboration and control which is a vital part of the movie making process, it is at its essence a collaborative art form, normally when a movie fails it is mostly due to this reason. While this movie is not an out and out failure it is well below where it should have ended up especially with the people involved both in front of as well as behind the camera. What the movie lacks is a general feeling of cohesion not only between the styles employed but also between each narrative thread as well as how the uniqueness of the hotel actually adds to the plot other than being a novel idea or a jumping off point. While I do not need everything explained in any movie, in fact an air of mystery is welcome, here we have almost everything explained to a degree that becomes tiresome. An aspect of having people arrive to a place that acts as a nexus is to not know each individual backstory, for me this would not only have added something to the movie but would have streamlined the entire production to a manageable time, something I cannot believe was not addressed in any meetings. Something Goddard has been good in the past has been managing a large cast, but here it seems like many of the secondary characters are treated like main cast members so that we have a battle for screen time, this is an example of where someone like Ridley Scott or Joss Whedon as producers could have had some input as both have always dealt with complex stories and of course extremely large casts. 

    “Bad Times at the El Royale” is set in 1969, Catholic priest Daniel Flynn, singer Darlene Sweet, salesman Laramie Seymour Sullivan, and the sarcastic Emily Summerspring arrive at the El Royale, where they meet the hotel’s only employee, Miles Miller. 

    There is no doubt that “Bad Times at the El Royale” is stacked with very good actors including MCU star Chris Hemsworth who seems to be searching for something to prove himself in, especially with his Marvel commitments possibly coming to an end shortly. However it is the character performances that really shine in this movie led by Jeff Bridges as a Priest (possibly) who has so many levels to his performance that you could forget how challenging this role was, he brings to life a real three dimensional human being who anchors this entire movie. In fact he is almost the only reason to sit through it. The second performance that I loved was that of Cynthia Erivo who threatens to steal the movie right out from under Bridges (no easy feat to do in any movie) as a singer who has decided to take charge of her life, attempting to do what she loves no matter the cost. Erivo who up to this year had been primarily known for her work as a stage actress (winning a Tony and a Grammy) shines in a role that requires her to perform a number of tricky elements including sing (which is something to see), be dramatic, funny as well as loving sometimes all in one scene all she does as well as anyone but with a steely unironic way that proves she is going to be a force onscreen for years to come. In terms of the rest of the cast Jon Hamm is great, he is a naturally gifted presence who is not onscreen long enough for my tatstes but that is where the great performances end and the more mediocre ones begin which is a shame, I believe it speaks more to the material than the talent on hand.

    All in all “Bad Times at the El Royale” is not actually a bad movie, in fact for most of its runtime it is very enjoyable as it has a big enough thriller element to keep audiences guessing as to where it is actually going, however it is marred by far too many characters as well as a narrative that at times seems to be clever as well as engaging but with a runtime at almost two and a half hours it becomes tiresome as well as expected which does impact the movie negatively. It actually helped that my expectations were set low when I viewed this 4K Blu-ray as I was pleasantly surprised by the look of the movie as well as plot, however as I have stated it needed trimming as well as a more concise narrative that did not rely on constant (and I mean constant) flashbacks to flesh out every character, this is done by good writing as well as good acting. 

    Technical Commentary:

    20th Century Fox Home Entertainment brings Bad Times at the El Royale to Ultra HD Blu-ray as a one-disc edition. At startup, the UHD goes straight to the main menu screen with full-motion clips, the usual options along the bottom and music playing in the background.

    Video

    “Bad Times at the El Royale” arrives on Ultra HD packing a fully-loaded and ultimately exquisite HEVC H.265 encode, showcasing a few welcomed improvements over the Blu-ray. Shot on traditional 35mm film, which was later mastered to a 4K DI, the freshly-minted 2160p transfer checks into the motel with a welcomed uptick in overall definition. The difference may be small, but there’s a bit more clarity in the background information. The unique design and pattern of the wallpaper is more detailed, the stitching and threading in the clothing and in the fabric of the furniture is more distinct, the UHD picture has a lovely film-like quality with excellent detailing throughout. 

    Contrast doesn’t appear to show a dramatic difference, which is likely the result of the filmmaker’s artistic intentions. Nevertheless, the modest improvement is enough for cleaner, slightly brighter whites that energize the explosive action.

    The biggest and most dramatic improvement are the colors, and for a bleak neo-noir thriller, this HDR10 presentation is bathed in sumptuously vibrant primaries, giving the action and tensely grim conversations a fascinatingly animated feel.

    Audio

    “Bad Times at the El Royale” is provided with an outstanding Dolby Atmos soundtrack that enhances its already-fantastic DTS-HD counterpart. 

    Imaging is splendid expansive and spacious, displaying superb acoustical detailing, sharply-defined highs and distinct, room-penetrating mids. The soundstage is continuously kept busy with plenty of off-screen activity that effectively travels between three front channels and into the top heights, generating a convincingly and highly engaging half-dome wall of sound. Benefitting from the extra breathing, the musical score and song selections reveal plenty of warmth and fidelity with distinct clarity between each note and instrumentation while also subtly bleeding into the heights and surrounds.

    Despite being a relatively front-heavy presentation, the object-based design sets home theaters ablaze with a variety of noises that often encircle the listening area.

  • Trailer: “Disney’s Aladdin” (2019)

    Trailer: “Disney’s Aladdin” (2019)

    Aladdin_Trailer2_NZ

    A thrilling and vibrant live-action adaptation of Disney’s animated classic, “Aladdin” is the exciting tale of the charming street rat Aladdin, the courageous and self-determined Princess Jasmine and the Genie who may be the key to their future. “Aladdin” opens in NZ Cinemas nationwide May 23, 2019.

  • Trailer: “The LEGO Movie 2” (2019)

    Trailer: “The LEGO Movie 2” (2019)

    The much-anticipated sequel to the critically acclaimed, global box office phenomenon that started it all, “The LEGO Movie 2” reunites the heroes of Bricksburg in an all new action-packed adventure to save their beloved city. It’s been five years since everything was awesome and the citizens are now facing a huge new threat: LEGO DUPLO® invaders from outer space, wrecking everything faster than it can be rebuilt. The battle to defeat them and restore harmony to the LEGO universe will take Emmet, Lucy, Batman and their friends to faraway, unexplored worlds, including a galaxy filled with fantastic planets, strange characters and catchy new songs. It will test their courage, creativity and Master Building skills, and reveal just how special they really are.

    y2mate.com – the_lego_movie_2_official_trailer_3_2019_hd_Ho12vRBUf4o_1080p

    The LEGO Movie 2 stars Chris Pratt, Elizabeth Banks, Will Arnett, Tiffany Haddish, Stephanie Beatriz, Alison Brie, Nick Offerman, Charlie Day, Maya Rudolph. Directed by Mike Mitchell from a screenplay by Phil Lord & Christopher Miller, story by Phil Lord & Christopher Miller and Matthew Fogel, based on LEGO Construction Toys, it is produced by Dan Lin, Phil Lord, Christopher Miller, Roy Lee, and Jinko Gotoh; with executive producers Jill Wilfert, Keith Malone, Matthew Ashton, Chris McKay, Zareh Nalbandian, Ryan Halprin, Will Allegra, Chris Leahy. Trisha Gum is the animation director. Patrick Marc Hanenberger is the production designer; Clare Knight, the editor; and Mark Mothersbaugh, the composer. Warner Bros. Pictures and Warner Animation Group present, in association with LEGO System A/S, a Rideback/Lord Miller/Vertigo Entertainment Production, The LEGO Movie 2. TheLEGOMovie.net 

    The film opens in 2D and 3D on April 11, 2019 and is distributed by Roadshow Films in New Zealand.

    HERO CHARACTERS EMMET AND LUCY FROM THE LEGO® MOVIE 2 HELP KIDS BUILD THEIR INNER AWESOMENESS WITH SMILING MIND APP 

    Warner Bros. Pictures and leading youth mindfulness platform Smiling Mind have launched a new meditation program, voiced by the heroes of the new big-screen animated adventure The LEGO® Movie 2, Emmet and Lucy, to encourage mindfulness in kids across New Zealand. 

    Three meditations will be available in the free Smiling Mind app from today to coincide with the release of The LEGO Movie 2 in New Zealand on April 11. The meditations voiced by beloved minifigures Emmet and Lucy draw on Emmet’s eternal optimism to give kids the tools for a healthy mind and outlook. They also explore the topics of self-acceptance, self-compassion and empathy, all themes from the movie. The app is available to download from the App Store or Google Play Store. 

    CEO of Smiling Mind, Dr Addie Wootten, said, “Children love movies and story-telling and we know the significant, and scientifically proven, benefits children experience from meditation, so, this is a great way for us to combine the two. Kids need to be engaged and what better way than having the voice of some of their favourite characters help them focus on the meditation.” 

    “Smiling Mind is always looking for innovative ways to deliver content that is accessible and aims to change lives through positive pre-emptive mental health tools. We have no doubt that this will be the start of a very exciting collaboration that will see children’s favourite movie characters come to life in such a positive way,” Dr Wootten said. 

    Emmet agrees. “When I’m not busy building awesome LEGO stuff, battling space aliens and saving the world with my best friend Lucy, I like to take a few minutes to reflect on what’s really important,” he stated. “These easy-to-follow meditations from Smiling Mind help me get in touch with the power of my thoughts so I can always try to be my best self.”

  • Television/Streaming review: “The Passage – Episode Ten – Last Lesson” (2019)

    “The Passage – Episode Ten – Last Lesson” (2019)


    Ten Episodes

    This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is voting-concept-rating-two-golden-stars-d-render-illustration-white-background-60907242.jpg

    Created by: Liz Heldens based on the novels written by Justin Cronin

    Featuring: Mark-Paul Gosselaar, Saniyya Sidney, Vincent Piazza, Brianne Howey McKinley Belcher III, Jamie McShane, Caroline Chikezie, Emmanuelle Chriqui

    Wolgast: “They all went home.”

    The final and hopefully last ever episode has arrived of the show based on the excellent adult trilogy ‘The Passage’ by Justin Cronin that charts the world as it passes from a pre apocalyptic period through to an ante period through to the post part which takes place over a one thousand year time period. 

    The general plot of the “The Passage” (2019) focuses on Project Noah, a secret medical facility where scientists are experimenting with a dangerous virus that could lead to the cure for all disease, but also carries the potential to wipe out the human race. When a young girl, Amy Bellafonte, is chosen to be a test subject, Federal Agent Brad Wolgast is the man who is tasked with bringing her to Project Noah. Ultimately, however, Wolgast becomes her surrogate father, as he tries to protect her at any cost.

    The problems, and make not mistake there are many, again stem from the fact that that the people behind the series have ignored what was great, compelling and original about the initial novel, ‘The Passage’. That is the pacing as well as the offering back stories to only the really important characters, not only that there were revelations about the other subordinate characters made throughout the novels which built up tension. Here there are revelations made whenever new characters are introduced which dulls the impact of the action that is taking place.

    It is obvious now that the writers of the show have no idea where the plot is going which in turns mean that we see jumps in the narrative that make no sense as above.

    As has been present throughout this entire series there is the continuing use of the most overused plot devices that is essentially an artificial way to build tension as well as move the narrative, that is keeping information or a secret away from others when in fact they should know what is going on.

    At this stage the brightest part of the series is still Saniyya Sidney, she shines above all others as Amy, the main character in both novels and series. At this early stage it does seem she might be better than the character that has been written for her, the reasons for her being, the relationship with her mother, the other worldliness of her actual being, the reason she is wanted, her actual attractiveness to Wolgast and finally why the story is centred around her. 

    After watching the entire season this show is really felt like hard work, I can only imagine what readers of the novel who are still watching think of this. For people that have not read the novel this show must feel like a retread of so many other horror/fantasy genre pieces that it becomes obvious with each passing moment what is going to happen next, which again is unlike the novel that had no easy answers for readers which in this day and age is a real gift.

    One of the changes that has been made and was apparent very early on was the alteration to the way the virals/vampires existed and operated in this version of the novel which is, along with the general story telling techniques, one of the very worst aspects as it robs the entire narrative of any originality that could have been ported over from the source material. This change had a major effect on the overall plot and narrative, instead of making Wolgast the (mostly) main character it featured the way in which this story was told which not only lessens the overall narrative but diminishes the reason for his existence, making him one dimensional as well as taking the attention away from the themes of the series which may explain why this seems just another terrible vampire series. Within the confines of the novel the objectives as well as the personalities did not exist which was a strength as it meant that the actual story was about people who were attempting to fend off the virals – which in itself has a deeper meaning already without even trying.

    There is strong evidence that this show is not getting a renewal, the evidence is all over this final episode from the bait and switch of a cure which seems hamfisted as well as the complete disappearance of a character who the show runners obviously introduced then did not know what to do with much like Wolgast’s friend who appears and disappears for no real reason. The ending which bastardizes as well as completely misses the point is a Frankenstein like edited piece of nothing that makes little sense in the overall arc of the show which renders the entire series pointless unless the point was to teach Amy how to fire a bow and arrow.

    There is so much that is completely misjudged, mishandled and tonally off with “The Passage” that it is reduced to a rip off of other similar shows that are supposed to be about something bigger but ends up being just like “The Strain” (2014-2017) not a good comparison, I will be pleased if this is not renewed and we never see it again, a shame as I love the novel.

    Episode Ten – “Last Lesson”

    Directed by: Mark Tonderai

    Written by: Liz Heldens & Joy Blake

    Following the explosion, surprising alliances are formed and a key figure returns to convince everyone to fight for their lives.


  • Television/Streaming review: “The Passage – Episode Nine – Stay in the Light” (2019)

    “The Passage – Episode Nine – Stay in the Light” (2019)


    Ten Episodes

    This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is voting-concept-rating-two-golden-stars-d-render-illustration-white-background-60907242.jpg

    Created by: Liz Heldens based on the novels written by Justin Cronin

    Featuring: Mark-Paul Gosselaar, Saniyya Sidney, Vincent Piazza, Brianne Howey McKinley Belcher III, Jamie McShane, Caroline Chikezie, Emmanuelle Chriqui

    Amy: “I never used to believe in monsters. I do now”

    The ninth and thankfully second to last episode has arrived of the show based on the excellent adult trilogy ‘The Passage’ by Justin Cronin that charts the world as it passes from a pre apocalyptic period through to an ante period through to the post part which takes place over a one thousand year time period. 

    The general plot of the “The Passage” (2019) focuses on Project Noah, a secret medical facility where scientists are experimenting with a dangerous virus that could lead to the cure for all disease, but also carries the potential to wipe out the human race. When a young girl, Amy Bellafonte, is chosen to be a test subject, Federal Agent Brad Wolgast is the man who is tasked with bringing her to Project Noah. Ultimately, however, Wolgast becomes her surrogate father, as he tries to protect her at any cost.

    The problems, and make not mistake there are many, again stem from the fact that that the people behind the series have ignored what was great, compelling and original about the initial novel, ‘The Passage’. That is the pacing as well as the offering back stories to only the really important characters, not only that there were revelations about the other subordinate characters made throughout the novels which built up tension. Here there are revelations made whenever new characters are introduced which dulls the impact of the action that is taking place.

    It is obvious now that the writers of the show have no idea where the plot is going which in turns mean that we see jumps in the narrative that make no sense as above. This episode has been taken to new heights in ridiculousness with not only once again characters making dumb decisions but also coincidences galore. As each episode has unfolded we can see that the writers of the show have been chopped and changed from episode to episode which lends to the jig saw nature and unevenness that this show smacks of, if there is one thing that this show needed it was a unified voice from one person with input on the overall narrative to make sure it made sense, if there is one thing that is obvious about this show it is the unevenness that effects everything from performance to direction.

    As has been present throughout this entire series there is the continuing use of the most overused plot devices that is essentially an artificial way to build tension as well as move the narrative, that is keeping information or a secret away from others when in fact they should know what is going on.

    It seems everyone behind the scenes has given up as even the linking from the end of the previous episode to the opening of this one has a time jump that seems to indicate that parts of the show were never filmed and the narrative is being made up in the edit. Not only that the sets seem as flimsy as the show itself which indicates budget issues especially in battle scenes where it appears people are firing weapons into the dark with no enemy in sight. We also have piped through for creature effects some of the basic sounds I have ever heard, they would be at home in late 1990s “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” (1997-2001) not in a show created almost twenty years later. It is not just the storyline that keeps getting made up as the show nears its (hopefully permanent) end, characters who should have been forgotten turn up, or survive somehow and others that were introduced have seemingly disappeared without explanation.

    At this stage the brightest part of the series is still Saniyya Sidney, she shines above all others as Amy, the main character in both novels and series. At this early stage it does seem she might be better than the character that has been written for her, the reasons for her being, the relationship with her mother, the other worldliness of her actual being, the reason she is wanted, her actual attractiveness to Wolgast and finally why the story is centred around her. 

    After watching over half a season this show is really feeling like hard work, I can only imagine what readers of the novel who are still watching think of this. For people that have not read the novel this show must feel like a retread of so many other horror/fantasy genre pieces that it becomes obvious with each passing moment what is going to happen next, which again is unlike the novel that had no easy answers for readers which in this day and age is a real gift.

    We are now at the point in the season where we should be, as the first novel did, really see some thrilling elements taking centre stage, however that is not the case at all. We are still being exposed to back stories that add very little to the overall plot except by trying to pull the wool over audiences eyes with a convoluted narrative which is neither original or engaging. There is simply nothing at the centre of this show which means everything is stacked like a house of cards, one good tug on a thread will see it collapsing under its own weight. I pray that this show will be put out of its and my misery.

    Episode Nine – “Stay in the Light”

    Directed by: Jason Ensle

    Written by: Daniel Thomsen & Vanessa Gomez

    Amy must decide what’s best for humanity when the only way to stop Fanning and the virals from escaping Project NOAH involves an explosion that could leave Brad, Sykes and the cure for the virus in the crossfire.